This post was originally written on 9th April, 2009.
This morning at breakfast, I had a chance to read The Guardian which the partner brought home last night.
An article by Viv Groskop
caught my attention. The feature is about two ‘feminist’ ‘performance’ ‘artists’ Katie O’Brien and Sinead King (they call their group ‘The Muffia’) performing on Oxford Street, London, in an attempt to raise some serious (but by now very meek and unoriginal) questions such as “Why don’t we resent the way the media portrays women?”, “Does no one care that women are mutilating themselves with cosmetic surgery?” and “Why do so few young women know what feminism is?”
Groskop describes the Muffia’s ‘performance’:
Dressed in a flesh-coloured body stocking and long blonde wig, Sinead King shouts into a loud-hailer at Oxford Circus: “Anyone want a new hymen?” Her colleague, Katie O’Brien, pretends to inject her face with a giant syringe labelled “Botox”. Every few minutes the pair down tools, belt up their red and white trenchcoats, put their hands in their pockets and “flash” passers-by, revealing curly merkins (pubic wigs). Onlookers laugh – and stare.
Sounds interesting? But do the audience understand King and O’Brien’s point and learn something from them?
Questionable. Groskop reveals, “few understand what they are protesting about.” Me neither. It seems to me that instead of ‘protesting’, the duo are asking the world, ‘Look at us! Look at us!’ Their public ‘performance’ showcases a stronger affinity with self-promotion than with protestation.
Please, ‘feminist’ ‘performance’ ‘artists’ (I put all three words in quotation marks because in the case of the Muffia these words could only be understood ironically), for the sake of females in general and other sensible feminists (both males and females), do rethink your strategies and approaches, if you truly care what you proclaim to preach. It looks too much like you are exploiting feminist topics/concerns AND your audience to have some juvenile and cheap fun.
The article concludes:
Most of all, they want to enjoy themselves. “I feel really liberated by flashing my merkin,” laughs King.
Need one wonder why sometimes women’s intelligence is challenged? At the end of the day, everybody laughs: the onlookers, the performer, and the blogger. This is reminiscent of a farce, which often provokes unsympathetic laughter and some cringing at the same time.
11 Responses “Feminist performance artists” →
April 9, 2009
I am very intrigued by this post of you, Tammy. The question you asked is hard to answer. But don’t we all ask questions when we confront contemporary art, esp. those postmodernist works, to which you also show skepticism before? Many feminist thinkers are misunderstood nowadays, and the feminist movements, or indeed, all identity politics, also atomizes in a disturbing and deconstructing fashion. I really donno what to think. But all I could say is I like these two crazy artists’ questions, and I like your question, too!
April 9, 2009
Thank you for your comment! I think the duo asked important and valid questions. Unfortunately, I don’t see how their ‘performance’ helped people to understand their supposed cause and answer those questions….
April 9, 2009
I think it actually works more than some of the marketing strategies, similarly aimed to shock… The shock value does get the grey cells working overtime:) I loved this post, got me thinking:)
April 10, 2009
I am a feminist!
but to be honest – in my opinion – the position of man in our (european?) community is much worse than a woman.
why can’t men raise the children – after a couple get divorced?
why can’t men stay at home with new born babies?
why are they let to do work that women can’t
April 11, 2009
Every social movement, by definition, must have someone pushing it. Sometimes leading is done at great sacrifice to the leader, but often there is some sort of gain. A book or books, some form of monetary compensation. I think you make an interesting point – when does it cross the line to become exploitation?
April 11, 2009
I think it’s great that these women are doing something to speak about the obsession with the female body and beauty in this society. I think homour is an effective tool to do this. It’s time people did become outspoken about these topics.
April 11, 2009
I think the feminist movement has made enough advances that empty gesture-politics will accomplish nothing. Surely we are well beyond burning bras.
April 12, 2009
I think the way to emancipation is going to be that men are expected to use just as much botox and cosmetic surgeries as women to be taken seriously in the future. The future is going to be more and more superficial.
April 22, 2009
from one middle-aged feminist: I’m still intrigued by artistic expression & protest, but this expression fails for me as both art and protest. there was a reason to burn the bra (along with the whalebone corset, footbinding shoes etc.) mostly as a way to own our bodies, but bra burning was only one very small protest in the larger cause of feminism. today we ask: why are women STILL paid less than men, why are women STILL so dependent on approval by men of body image, why are women STILL the ones who exploit and keep other women down, and why is it STILL easier to vote a Black man into office in the U.S. than a woman (and no, it’s not just because she’s the ‘wrong woman’ – that’s too damn easy). and that’s the problem I have with these street artists — what they’re doing is too damn easy (we have real traditions to draw from – Georgia O’Keefe, Louise Nevelson, even Madonna). and Tammy, your protest means more, is about real power and not merely a ‘bit of a lark’ as much as we all love satire and fun and social commentary.
June 16, 2009
Amber Hawk Swanson’s Realdoll™ explores the interplay between repulsion, desire and surrender: http://bit.ly/17Z8vG
March 18, 2010
Great blog post; very vocal opinion.